Judicial Self-Governance in the New Millennium

Beschreibung

This book is a comparative study of judge-managed court systems across Australia, Europe and North America. This book makes an original contribution to the literature of court administration by providing a framework for examining court-service models of judicial councils, the policymaking bodies of courts and tribunals. This book promises to assist court administration scholars, judicial leaders, and policymakers in devising more effective organizational solutions to the contemporary challenges of judicial self-governance. 
The author Dr. Tim Bunjevac offers a nuanced elaboration of judicial accountability in court administration and a model institutional framework of court governance, comparing key Australian and international models of court administration, including the Australian Federal and two state court systems, Irish, English, Canadian and Dutch models. With a close case study, the author puts his sharpest focus on the Victoria, Australia, which introduced a judicial council in 2014. 
This book does an innovative job of proposing a new elaboration of judicial accountability in court administration. This book proposes that the likely success of any court system reform ultimately depends on the quality of the interaction between the courts, government, and other justice system stakeholders, which must be rooted in the concepts of organizational transparency and administrative accountability.
This book is a comparative study of judge-managed court systems across Australia, Europe and North America. This book makes an original contribution to the literature of court administration by providing a framework for examining court-service models of judicial councils, the policymaking bodies of courts and tribunals. This book promises to assist court administration scholars, judicial leaders, and policymakers in devising more effective organizational solutions to the contemporary challenges of judicial self-governance. 
The author Dr. Tim Bunjevac offers a nuanced elaboration of judicial accountability in court administration and a model institutional framework of court governance, comparing key Australian and international models of court administration, including the Australian Federal and two state court systems, Irish, English, Canadian and Dutch models. With a close case study, the author puts his sharpest focus on the Victoria, Australia, which introduced a judicial council in 2014. 
This book does an innovative job of proposing a new elaboration of judicial accountability in court administration. This book proposes that the likely success of any court system reform ultimately depends on the quality of the interaction between the courts, government, and other justice system stakeholders, which must be rooted in the concepts of organizational transparency and administrative accountability.

Develops an original court governance policy framework for judge-managed courts based on synthesis of international best practices Can be used as a policy manual to assist court administration scholars, judicial leaders, and government policymakers in devising more effective organizational solutions to the contemporary challenges of judicial-self governance Provides in-depth analysis of Judicial Councils and other institutions of judicial self-governance Provides a unique interdisciplinary analysis of judge-managed courts through the following disciplinary lenses: law, court administration, corporate governance, public administration and constitutional theory

Autor*in

Tim Bunjevac

Themen in »Judicial Self-Governance in the New Millennium«

Judicial review Judicial administration Self-Governance Constitutional law Administrative law Public law Civil law Court governance judicial self-governance Court administration Judicial councils court management Judicial institutions judicial bureaucracies Comparative law

Stimmen zu »Judicial Self-Governance in the New Millennium«

Details

Link teilen