Arctic communities are experiencing global, societal and economic pressures
coupled with additional environmental changes. The comparison of local and
indigenous observations with instrumental records clearly illustrates how
Arctic communities, both now and in the past, have adapted to a variety of
changes and risks affecting their livelihoods. Projections of future climate
change indicate a further reduction in sea ice extent and stability, change
to the frequency and intensity of weather events and seasonal transition,
alteration in the abundance and distribution of fish and terrestrial
biodiversity, and lessening permafrost stability. All these factors will
affect Arctic resident's livelihoods and wellbeing.
Under the auspices of the International Polar Year 2007-2008 (IPY), the
CAVIAR consortium was formed with partners from all eight Arctic countries
as a response to the need for systematic assessment of community
vulnerabilities and adaptations across the Arctic. The aim of the
interdisciplinary CAVIAR project is to increase understanding of the
vulnerability of Arctic communities to changing societal and environmental
conditions, including climate change. Presented in this volume are the
results and accomplishments drawn from the partnership with local
collaborators from fifteen Arctic communities. In each of the case studies
researchers have documented the conditions and forces that exacerbate or
diminish vulnerabilities in each of the case studies, identified previous
and current adaptation strategies, and assess the prospects for the
development of effective adaptive strategies and policies in the future.
The ‘Year’ That Changed How We View the North This book is about a new theoretical approach that transformed the field of Arctic social studies and about a program called International Polar Year 2007–2008 (IPY) that altered the position of social research within the broader polar science. The concept for IPY was developed in 2003–2005; its vision was for researchers from many nations to work together to gain cro- disciplinary insight into planetary processes, to explore and increase our understanding of the polar regions, the Arctic and Antarctica, and of their roles in the global system. IPY 2007–2008, the fourth program of its kind, followed in the footsteps of its predecessors, the first IPY in 1882–1883, the second IPY in 1932–1933, and the third IPY (later renamed to ‘International Geophysical Year’ or IGY) in 1957–1958. All earlier IPY/IGY have been primarily geophysical initiatives, with their focus on meteorology, atmospheric and geomagnetic observations, and with additional emphasis on glaciology and sea ice circulation. As such, they excluded socio-economic disciplines and polar indigenous people, often deliberately, except for limited ethnographic and natural history collection work conducted by some expeditions of the first IPY. That once dominant vision biased heavily towards geophysics, oceanography, and ice-sheets, left little if any place for people, that is, the social sciences and the humanities, in what has been commonly viewed as the ‘hard-core’ polar research.
Documents and assesses the nature of vulnerability in communities across the entire Arctic Interdisciplinary research approach Demonstrates the importance of a shared analytical framework for comparing results across case studies Empirical examples of vulnerabilities and adaptive strategies from a region of the world commonly viewed as having high susceptibility to climate change
Grete K. Hovelsrud
Adaptation Arctic Communities Vulnerability climate change environmental change integration climate change impacts
From the reviews:
“This book aims to present a human approach to understanding the vulnerabilities and adaptive capacities of communities, particularly those in the Arctic, that are experiencing rapid socio-economic and environmental changes. … I recommend this book particularly for Arctic researchers … . The book is also recommended for students in the social sciences, who can increase their understanding of the vulnerability of Arctic communities and apply the framework and knowledge developed by the multidisciplinary team in their studies and future careers.” (Arctic, December, 2011)