A demonstration of how recent critical theory in the wake of the ›turns‹ has been shaped by dualism, and how to develop conceptual alternatives to it.
Dualistic thinking has been questioned by some writers associated with the material, ontological, and affective turns. Yet, these and other writers linked to the ›turns‹ have themselves reproduced dualistic theorizing. Caroline Braunmühl also shows that there are dualistic patterns in significant contributions to queer theory as well as Foucauldian diagnoses of the present. From a perspective sympathetic to the critical efforts made by poststructuralist and related theorists, she analyzes works by Sara Ahmed, Karen Barad, Michael Hardt, Antonio Negri, Michel Foucault, and others. The book suggests specific alternatives to dualistic as well as identitarian ways of framing conceptual pairs such as matter/mind, affect/discourse and negativity/affirmation.
Caroline Braunmühl
Caroline Braunmühl is a sociologist and an independent scholar. Having earned her first academic degrees at the University of Cape Town and the University of London (Goldsmiths College), she was awarded the degree of Dr. phil. by Universität Hamburg. Her research focuses on poststructuralism as a heterogeneous theoretical movement and, more generally, on social, cultural and political theory, queer theory, and gender studies.
Michel Foucault Michel Foucault Sara Ahmed Sara Ahmed Karen Barad Karen Barad Affect Affect New Materialism New Materialism Culture Culture Science Science Cultural Theory