The Settlement of Inter-State Disputes through ICJ Advisory Opinions
An Analysis of the Eastern Carelia Doctrine
Buch in deiner Nähe kaufen
Beschreibung
This book offers an in-depth analysis of the relationship between the principle of consensual dispute settlement in international law and the advisory opinion function of the International Court of Justice (ICJ). In 2019, the ICJ issued its Chagos Advisory Opinion, finding that the Chagos Archipelago belongs to Mauritius and that the United Kingdom’s administration of the archipelago is contrary to international law. In the proceedings, the United Kingdom and Judge Donoghue invoked the Eastern Karelia doctrine. The 1923 doctrine states: The Court does not issue an advisory opinion if, by doing so, it would undermine the basic rule that states may submit disputes to judicial settlement only with their consent.
This title is also available as Open Access.
Autor*in
Christoph Priess
Themen in »The Settlement of Inter-State Disputes through ICJ Advisory Opinions«
Gerichtsfunktion Prinzip der konsensualen Streitbeilegung Gutachtenverfahren Monetary Gold-Doktrin Vertragsauslegung Autorität Zuständigkeit Vereinte Nationen Internationaler Gerichtshof judicial function principles of consensual dispute settlement advisory procedure Monetary Gold doctrine treaty interpretation judicial authority