The study examines how states choose strategies to combat separatist terrorism and challenges the common classification of such strategies as either repressive or conciliatory, as well as their normative evaluation as successful or unsuccessful. Instead, it emphasizes the importance of structural and contextual conditions shaping state decisions. The central focus is on how internal and external factors interact and influence both the selection of strategies and their outcomes.
Using a comparative approach, the study analyzes selected cases from Europe and Asia to assess the extent to which counterterrorism strategies are shaped by political, historical, and security-related contexts. It argues that policy solutions cannot simply be transferred from one region to another without considering contextual differences. The overall aim is to develop a holistic and context-sensitive analytical framework for evaluating state responses to separatist terrorism, which may also serve as a reference point for assessing the Turkish case in future research.
Beyza Gülin Güney
Ayrılıkçı terörizm, Ayrılıkçı terörizmle mücadelede, Devlet Stratejilerine Avrupa devletleri, Asya devletleri, Separatist terrorism State strategies in the fight against separatist terrorism, European states, Asian states Separatistischer Terrorismus, Staatliche Strategien zur Bekämpfung des separatistischen Terrorismus Europäische Staaten, Asiatische Staaten separatistischer Terrorismus Terrorismusbekämpfung Sicherheitspolitik kollektive Bestrafung Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, Staatszentrierte Analyse, Westlich dominierte Forschungsansätze, Türkei-Fallstudie, PKK Security policy Collective punishment Comparative politics State-centered analysis Western-dominated research approaches