The Objectivity of Judicial Decisions
A Comparative Analysis of Nine Jurisdictions
Buch in deiner Nähe kaufen
Beschreibung
This book discusses how judges qualify their activities as objective. The data for this project was retrieved from a large sample of cases using Langacker’s methodology. The sample included over a thousand decisions from Brazil, Hungary, Italy, Lithuania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Romania and the UK.
This book discusses how judges qualify their activities as objective. The data for this project was retrieved from a large sample of cases using Langacker’s methodology. The sample included over a thousand decisions from Brazil, Hungary, Italy, Lithuania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Romania and the UK. The decisions considered allegations of judicial bias, unfairness, and injustice. Pre-judices are shared cognitive methods that legal practitioners perceive as necessary. The results of the study directly confirm Pierre Legrand’s claims of pre-judices in legal discourse, and as corollary, Jules L. Coleman and Brian Leiter’s idea of modest objectivity in law.
Autor*in
Vito Breda
Themen in »The Objectivity of Judicial Decisions«
Analysis Breda Comparative Decisions Judicial Judicial Bias Jurisdictions Jurisprudence Justice Legal Positivism Legal Reasoning Legal Semiotic Nine Objectivity