(Keine) Haftung für Produktfehler?

Beschreibung

Germany and New Zealand regulate personal injury caused by defective products differently: while Germany relies on producer liability, New Zealand compensates for personal injury through a no-fault accident compensation system, which replaces liability. Muriel Isa Nißle discusses both approaches and outlines their strengths and weaknesses.
Muriel Isa Nißle examines two systems of compensation for damages-the German producer and product liability system, which internalizes damages, and the New Zealand Accident Compensation Scheme for replacing liability-which organize compensation for personal injury caused by accidents involving defective products in completely different ways. While damages incurred in Germany generally remain within the relationship between the injuring party and the injured party and, if necessary, must be compensated by the manufacturer as the injuring party, all accident-related personal injuries in New Zealand have been compensated since 1974 by a no-fault accident compensation system that does not seek recourse from the injuring party. The author presents both systems, analyzes their basic structures, strengths, and weaknesses, and develops solutions for improving existing deficits.

Autor*in

Muriel Isa Nißle
Geboren 1995; Studium der Rechtswissenschaften an der Universität Göttingen; Stipendiatin der Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes; Wissenschaftliche Mitarbeiterin am Lehrstuhl für Bürgerliches Recht, Medizinrecht, Europäisches und Internationales Privatrecht in Göttingen; 2022-23 Forschungsaufenthalt in Wellington, Neuseeland; Rechtsreferendariat am Landgericht Heidelberg.

Themen in »(Keine) Haftung für Produktfehler?«

Accident Compensation Scheme Effizienz Gerechtigkeit Haftungsersetzung Haftungsrecht Neuseeland Personenschäden Produkthaftung Produzentenhaftung Schadensausgleich Schadensersatzrecht Schadensprävention Verschuldenshaftung

Stimmen zu »(Keine) Haftung für Produktfehler?«

Details

Link teilen