Quidam putant

Beschreibung

Why is it that Ancient Roman jurists reported legal controversies? Do these controversies represent real debates, or could they be a rhetoric device used for legal interpretations? Simon Ruben Loheide's study aims to find an answer by developing a novel methodology for assessing the authenticity of controversies and applying it to the works of the Roman jurist Ulpius Marcellus.
Why is it that Ancient Roman jurists reported legal controversies? Do these controversies represent real debates, or could they be a rhetoric device used for legal interpretations? Simon Ruben Loheide's study aims to find an answer by developing a novel methodology for assessing the authenticity of controversies and applying it to the works of the Roman jurist Ulpius Marcellus.

Autor*in

Simon Ruben Loheide
Geboren 1994; Studium der Rechtswissenschaft an der Universität Heidelberg und der Università degli Studi Bologna; 2019 Erste Juristische Prüfung; Akademischer Mitarbeiter an der Universität Heidelberg und der Universität zu Köln; Forschungsaufenthalt an der Università degli Studi Siena; 2024 Promotion; Rechtsreferendariat im Bezirk des OLG Köln.

Themen in »Quidam putant«

Fallrecht Rechtsschulen Historizität Auslegung

Stimmen zu »Quidam putant«

Details

Link teilen