In determining undue discrimination against a creditor, the services rendered by the party opposing the avoidance are taken into account - but not in the law of legal consequences. Ivan Labusga takes this contradiction as an opportunity to fundamentally investigate the role of services rendered in insolvency rescission and develops a model for legal consequences that considers the executory agreement independently of the proceedings.
In determining undue discrimination against a creditor, the services rendered by the party opposing the avoidance are taken into account - but not in the law of legal consequences. Ivan Labusga takes this contradiction as an opportunity to fundamentally investigate the role of services rendered in insolvency rescission and develops a model for legal consequences that considers the executory agreement independently of the proceedings.
Ivan Labusga
Geboren 1990; Studium der Rechtswissenschaft in Freiburg und Glasgow; Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter am Institut für deutsches und ausländisches Zivilprozessrecht der Universität Freiburg; 2017 Erste Juristische Staatsprüfung; 2020 Promotion; derzeit Referendariat am Landgericht Darmstadt.
§ 144 Abs. 2 S. 1 InsO Mittelbare Gläubigerbenachteiligung Teilanfechtung/ partielle Anfechtung Gegenleistung Anfechtung des Verpflichtungsgeschäfts