The Case for Proto-Mark

Beschreibung

In this book, Delbert Burkett provides the most comprehensive case to date for the Proto-Mark hypothesis, the theory that all three Synoptic evangelists (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) used a written source similar to, but earlier than, the Gospel of Mark. He offers new data that calls into question the main alternative theories.
Delbert Burkett addresses the Synoptic Problem, the question of what sources were used by the Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke). The most common explanation for the material shared by Matthew and Luke (the double tradition) is that Matthew and Luke both used a source now lost, called Q. If we adopt the Q hypothesis to account for the double tradition, then what theory best accounts for the material that Matthew and Luke share with Mark (the Markan material)? Three main theories have been proposed: Matthew and Luke used the Gospel of Mark as a source (the standard theory of Markan priority), Matthew and Luke used a revised version of Mark's gospel (the Deutero-Mark hypothesis), or all three evangelists used a source similar to, but earlier than, the Gospel of Mark (the Proto-Mark hypothesis). Delbert Burkett provides new data that calls into question the standard theory of Markan priority and the Deutero-Mark hypothesis. He offers the most comprehensive case to date for the Proto-Mark hypothesis, concluding that this theory best accounts for the Markan material.

Autor*in

Delbert Burkett
Born 1949; 1989 PhD; 1996-99 Assistant Professor, 1999-2010 Associate Professor, since 2010 Professor of Religious Studies at Louisiana State University; 2010-16 Chair of the Department of Philosophy & Religious Studies.

Themen in »The Case for Proto-Mark«

Synoptic Gospels two-document hypothesis Markan priority minor agreements Deutero-Mark

Stimmen zu »The Case for Proto-Mark«

Details

Link teilen