For a century, Ulpian’s two main works, which essentially form the foundation of European jurisprudence, have been considered lemmatic commentaries – unjustly, as we already know in relation to Libri ad edictum. But what about the Sabinus commentary? And what is the difference between these two works? This volume provides an answer by comparing the passages in which the content overlaps.
Jan Dirk Harke
Ulpianus Rechtsgeschichte Römisches Recht Heterogene Texte Roman law heterogeneous texts Ulpian legal history