In some criminal cases, it is a difficult challenge to find out what happened. Fact finders will rely on different approaches ranging from intuitive heuristics to scientific insights. With 11 real cases, this book illustrates how professional judges evaluate criminal evidence. Moreover, the legal psychological approach to the same evidence is discussed, as the author served as a psychological expert witness in these cases. Targeted pieces of evidence and related topics include:
• Eyewitness identification
• Eyewitness testimony
• Confession evidence
• Deception
• Memory flaws
• Legal decision making
It is a must-read for practitioners and graduate students in criminal law, forensic psychology, and legal psychology.
In some criminal cases, it is a difficult challenge to find out what happened. Fact finders will rely on different approaches ranging from intuitive heuristics to scientific insights. With 11 real cases, this book illustrates how professional judges evaluate criminal evidence. Moreover, the legal psychological approach to the same evidence is discussed, as the author served as a psychological expert witness in these cases. Targeted pieces of evidence and related topics include:
• Eyewitness identification
• Eyewitness testimony
• Confession evidence
• Deception
• Memory flaws
• Legal decision making
It is a must-read for practitioners and graduate students in criminal law, forensic psychology, and legal psychology.
Eric Rassin
Psychological analysis of criminal evidence Likelihood ratio approach to criminal evidence Bayesian approach to criminal evidence Crime stories and psychology Legal psychology and evidence evaluation Mistaken identifications Eyewitness errors and false convictions Interrogation tactics and false confessions Miscarriages of justice