Marx’s Theory of Value in Chapter 1 of Capital

Beschreibung

“Professor Moseley’s deep knowledge of Marx’s texts is on full display in this work. Critics and defenders should agree: this book is an immensely important contribution to the debate that deserves a wide audience.”

—Tony Smith, Professor Emeritus in Philosophy, Iowa State University, USA 

—Guido Starosta, Professor of History of Economic Thought, National University of Quilmes, Argentina 

“Fred Moseley’s book shows that, for Marx, exchange follows and is determined by production rather than vice versa as Heinrich’s value-form interpretation maintains. This logic is a necessary prerequisite for Marx’s theory of exploitation and the concomitanttask of overthrowing capitalism.”

—Stavros Mavroudeas, Professor of Political Economy, Panteion University, Greece 

Chapter 1 is the most important chapter in Capital, as well as the most difficult and the most controversial. An influential interpretation of Chapter 1 in recent decades has been the so-called “value-form interpretation” of Marx’s theory in general and Chapter 1 in particular.  The most important proponent of the value-form interpretation today, both in Germany and in the English-speaking world, is Michael Heinrich, and Heinrich’s work has emphasized the first chapter. Heinrich’s latest book in English is a detailed commentary of the first seven chapters of Volume 1 of Capital. The publication of an English translation of Heinrich’s book is an important event in Marxian scholarship and it is important to critically engage with this important book in order to advance our understanding of this critical foundational chapter. This book emphasizes the quantitative issue of whether the magnitude of value and socially necessary labour-time are determined in production or also depend on exchange and demand, which has been the main issue in the controversy over the value-form interpretation. 

Fred Moseley is Emeritus Professor of Economics at Mount Holyoke College, USA, and author of Money and Totality (2017).

Chapter 1 is the most important chapter in Capital, as well as the most difficult and the most controversial. An influential interpretation of Chapter 1 in recent decades has been the so-called “value-form interpretation” of Marx’s theory in general and Chapter 1 in particular. The most important proponent of the value-form interpretation today, both in Germany and in the English-speaking world, is Michael Heinrich, and Heinrich’s work has emphasized the first chapter. Heinrich’s latest book in English is a detailed commentary of the first seven chapters of Volume 1 of Capital. The publication of an English translation of Heinrich’s book is an important event in Marxian scholarship and it is important to critically engage with this important book in order to advance our understanding of this critical foundational chapter. This book emphasizes the quantitative issue of whether the magnitude of value and socially necessary labour-timeare determined in production or also depend on exchange and demand, which has been the main issue in the controversy over the value-form interpretation.

Autor*in

Fred Moseley

Themen in »Marx’s Theory of Value in Chapter 1 of Capital«

Marx Capital Heinrich Value Theory of Value Value-form intermpretation Demand political economy form of value magnitute of value labor time

Stimmen zu »Marx’s Theory of Value in Chapter 1 of Capital«

“A willing and able debater, with a nimble mastery of the textual history of Marx’s critique of political economy, Moseley’s writing brings together philological attention, a sensitivity to the logical construction of Marx’s theory, and a commitment to comradely polemic, all present in spades in his most recent book, Marx’s Theory of Value in Chapter 1 of Capital: A Critique of Heinrich’s Value-Form Interpretation.” (Jason Smith, H-Net Reviews, h-net.org, March, 2024)

“Professor Moseley’s deep knowledge of Marx’s texts is on full display in this work.  His case for value being fully constituted in production prior to exchange is unsurpassed in detail and force. The thesis will remain controversial. But critics and defenders should agree on at least one point: this book is an immensely important contribution to the debate that deserves a wide audience.”

—Tony Smith, Professor Emeritus in Philosophy, Iowa State University, USA 

Details

Link teilen