Islamic Disputation Theory
The Uses & Rules of Argument in Medieval Islam
Buch in deiner Nähe kaufen
Beschreibung
This book charts the evolution of Islamic dialectical theory (jadal) over a four-hundred year period. It includes an extensive study of the development of methods of disputation in Islamic theology (kalām) and jurisprudence (uṣūl al-fiqh) from the tenth through the fourteenth centuries. The author uses the theoretical writings of Islamic theologians, jurists, and philosophers to describe the concept
Overall, this investigation looks at the extent to which the development of Islamic modes of disputation is rooted in Aristotle and the classical tradition. The author reconstructs the contents of the earliest systematic treatment of the subject by b. al-Rīwandī. He then contrasts the theological understanding of dialectic with the teachings of the Arab Aristotelians–al-Fārābī, Avicenna, and Averroes. Next, the monograph shows how jurists took over the theological method of dialectic and applied it to problems peculiar to jurisprudence.Although the earliest writings on dialectic are fairly free of direct Aristotelian influence, there are coincidences of themes and treatment. But after jurisprudence had assimilated the techniques of theological dialectic, its own theory became increasingly influenced by logical terminology and techniques. At the end of the thirteenth century there arose a new discipline, the ādāb al-baḥth. While the theoretical underpinnings of the new system are Aristotelian, the terminology and order of debate place it firmly in the Islamic tradition of disputation.
This book charts the evolution of Islamic dialectical theory (jadal) over a four-hundred year period. It includes an extensive study of the development of methods of disputation in Islamic theology (kalām) and jurisprudence (uṣūl al-fiqh) from the tenth through the fourteenth centuries. The author uses the theoretical writings of Islamic theologians, jurists, and philosophers to describe the concept
Overall, this investigation looks at the extent to which the development of Islamic modes of disputation is rooted in Aristotle and the classical tradition. The author reconstructs the contents of the earliest systematic treatment of the subject by b. al-Rīwandī. He then contrasts the theological understanding of dialectic with the teachings of the Arab Aristotelians–al-Fārābī, Avicenna, and Averroes. Next, the monograph shows how jurists took over the theological method of dialectic and applied it to problems peculiar to jurisprudence.
Although the earliest writingson dialectic are fairly free of direct Aristotelian influence, there are coincidences of themes and treatment. But after jurisprudence had assimilated the techniques of theological dialectic, its own theory became increasingly influenced by logical terminology and techniques. At the end of the thirteenth century there arose a new discipline, the ādāb al-baḥth. While the theoretical underpinnings of the new system are Aristotelian, the terminology and order of debate place it firmly in the Islamic tradition of disputation.
Charts the evolution of Islamic dialectical theory over 400 years Studies the influence of Aristotle Uses the writings of Islamic theologians, jurists, and philosophers
Autor*in
Larry Benjamin Miller
Themen in »Islamic Disputation Theory«
Shams al-Din al-Samarqandī and the ādāb al-baḥth Aristotle’s Topics in the Islamic tradition al-Fārābī, Avicenna Development of Islamic Jurisprudence Argumentation in Islamic law and theology Usul al-fiqh, kalām and falsafa Methods of argumentation in Medieval Islam The Scholastic Method in the Islamic world History of Logic in Islam Dialectic and Disputation in Islam theological dialectic Arab Philosophy Dialectic in Jurisprudence Islamic theologians evolution of Islamic dialectical theory
Stimmen zu »Islamic Disputation Theory«
“Very few unpublished PhD dissertations have had a formative influence on a field. One of the precious few is Larry Miller’s Princeton dissertation from 1984 on Islamic disputation theory. It proposed an original and compelling account of the development of the discipline, from the earliest extant Arabic works … to the composition of classic madrasa handbooks … . It … has served as the starting point for all later studies of Arabic/Islamic dialectics in European languages.” (Khaled El-Rouayheb, Journal of the History of Philosophy, Vol. 61 (3), July, 2023)
()