This volume explores the shifting tides of how political violence is memorialized in today's decentralized, digital era. The book enhances our understanding of how the digital turn is changing the ways that we remember, interpret, and memorialize the past. It also raises practical and ethical questions of how we should utilize these tools and study their impacts. Cases covered include memorialization efforts related to the genocides in Rwanda, Cambodia, Europe (the Holocaust), and Armenia; to non-genocidal violence in Haiti, and the Portuguese Colonial War on the African Continent; and of the September 11 attacks on the United States.
This volume explores the shifting tides of how political violence is memorialized in today's decentralized, digital era. The book enhances our understanding of how the digital turn is changing the ways that we remember, interpret, and memorialize the past. It also raises practical and ethical questions of how we should utilize these tools and study their impacts. Cases covered include memorialization efforts related to the genocides in Rwanda, Cambodia, Europe (the Holocaust), and Armenia; to non-genocidal violence in Haiti, and the Portuguese Colonial War on the African Continent; and of the September 11 attacks on the United States.
Eve Monique Zucker
Memorialization Collective memory Social memory Genocide Mass violence Digital turn Digital revolution
“This book shows the way in which small groups of people doing the work of remembrance within civil society resist and transcend the appropriation of the past by state actors. Using physical and digital sites of memory, these memory activists have preserved and disseminated the history and experience of suffering ignored, hijacked or distorted by those in power. Risks remain, but remembrance unmoored is remembrance affirmed and protected from atrophy and erasure.” (Jay Winter, Charles J. Stille Professor of History Emeritus, Yale University, USA)
“A tremendously important contribution to the growing attention to the ways past atrocities are memorialized through various media. The focus on non-state actors and the productive resistance to state-controlled memory helps readers understand how memorialization truly works, rather than rehearing or rationalizing state agendas regarding how memorialization should work. The balance between novel insights into various human rights violations, including a number of genocides, and the rich theoretical aspects of the case analyses taken as a whole is as rare in the literature as it is valuable even for the most knowledgeable scholar. The studies of the ways in which new technologies are impacting atrocity memory pushes readers far beyond the comfortable and reductive ideas about social media that not only pervade the media but also strongly impact academic thinking on the topic.” (Henry C. Theriault, President of the International Association of Genocide Scholars and Co-Editor of Genocide Studies International)
()