Congressional Constraint and Judicial Responses
Examining Judiciary Committee Court Curbing and Court Structuring Bills
Buch in deiner Nähe kaufen
Beschreibung
“This book provides a novel description of conflict between the Congress and the US Supreme Court. Tecklenburg’s perspective on legislative constraints on the judiciary breathes fresh air into an important and timely topic. At a time when high-stakes conflict among our national institutions is politically and socially salient, this book will be essential reading.”
—Tom Clark, Charles Howard Candler Professor of Political Science, Emory University, USA
This book examines the relationship between Congress and the Federal Judiciary over time. Several aspects of this separation of power dynamics are examined, including court curbing legislation, court structuring legislation, justiciability, and judicial review. Unlike prior works, this book examines this relationship from a bicameral perspective, as it is argued that there are different motivations and reasons as to why and how each chamber of Congress approaches its relationship with the federal judiciary. In addition, this book considers the role of the judiciary committee in the legislative process, as bills that were reported out of committee are examined. Several possible causes of this legislative activity and judicial responses are analyzed, including polarization, judicial review, unanimity on the court, the changing issue agenda of the Court, ideological institutional distance, and divided government. The results reveal that there are important differences with regard to how the chambers interact with the federal judiciary.
H. Chris Tecklenburg is an Assistant Professor in the Political Science and International Studies department at Georgia Southern University, USA.
This book examines the relationship between Congress and the Federal Judiciary over time. Several aspects of this separation of power dynamics are examined, including court curbing legislation, court structuring legislation, justiciability, and judicial review. Unlike prior works, this book examines this relationship from a bicameral perspective, as it is argued that there are different motivations and reasons as to why and how each chamber of Congress approaches its relationship with the federal judiciary. In addition, this book considers the role of the judiciary committee in the legislative process, as bills that were reported out of committee are examined. Several possible causes of this legislative activity and judicial responses are analyzed, including polarization, judicial review, unanimity on the court, the changing issue agenda of the Court, ideological institutional distance, and divided government. The results reveal that there are important differences with regard to how the chambers interact with the federal judiciary.
Performs a bicameral analysis of court curbing and court structuring legislation over time Examines court curbing and court structuring legislation from the perspective of the judiciary committees Analyzes administrative court curbing, which describes when Congress prevents judicial review over executive or administrative actions Provides an account of separation of powers motivations behind judicial review and justiciability
Autor*in
H. Chris Tecklenburg
Themen in »Congressional Constraint and Judicial Responses«
judicial politics judiciary committee US Congress House of Representatives US Senate court curbing bicameral analysis court structuring Justiciability legislation judicial oversight Supreme Court judicial review Article III US Constitution
Stimmen zu »Congressional Constraint and Judicial Responses«
“This book provides a novel description of conflict between the Congress and the US Supreme Court. Tecklenburg’s perspective on legislative constraints on the judiciary breathes fresh air into an important and timely topic. At a time when high-stakes conflict among our national institutions is politically and socially salient, this book will be essential reading.”
—Tom Clark, Charles Howard Candler Professor of Political Science, Emory University, USA
()