A Philosophical Critique of Empirical Arguments for Postmortem Survival

Beschreibung

Sudduth provides a critical exploration of classical empirical arguments for survival arguments that purport to show that data collected from ostensibly paranormal phenomena constitute good evidence for the survival of the self after death. Utilizing the conceptual tools of formal epistemology, he argues that classical arguments are unsuccessful.

Autor*in

Michael Sudduth

Themen in »A Philosophical Critique of Empirical Arguments for Postmortem Survival«

argue communication concept corpus death epistemology experience nation philosophy

Stimmen zu »A Philosophical Critique of Empirical Arguments for Postmortem Survival«

Details

Link teilen