The Myth of Homeland Security

Beschreibung

"As I write this, I'm sitting in a restaurant in a major U.S.airport, eating my breakfast with a plastic knife and fork. Iworked up quite an appetite getting here two hours early andshuffling in the block-long lines until I got to the securitycheckpoint where I could take off my shoes, remove my belt, and putmy carry-on luggage through the screening system. "What's going on? It's homeland security. Welcome to the new age ofknee-jerk security at any price. Well, I've paid, and you've paid,and we'll all keep paying-but is it going to help? Have we embarkedon a massive multibillion-dollar boondoggle that's going to donothing more than make us feel more secure? Are we paying nosebleedprices for "feel-good" measures?. "This book was painful to write. By nature, I am a problem solver.Professionally I have made my career out of solving complexproblems efficiently by trying to find the right place to push hardand make a difference. Researching the Department of HomelandSecurity, the FBI, CIA, INS, the PATRIOT Act, and so forth, onefalls into a rabbit's hole of interdependent lameness anddysfunction. I came face to face with the realization that thereare gigantic bureaucracies that exist primarily for the solepurpose of prolonging their existence, that the very structure ofbureaucracy rewards inefficiency and encourages territorialism andturf warfare."

Autor*in

Marcus Ranum

Themen in »The Myth of Homeland Security«

Computer Science Informatik Networking / Security Netzwerke / Sicherheit Political Science Politikwissenschaft

Stimmen zu »The Myth of Homeland Security«

This rather jumbled study of the state of modern American security issues falls short of indispensable but rises well above useless polemic. Saying the most in his own professional area, information-technology security, Ranum denigrates the prospect of "cyberwar," but then discusses in some detail the disruption that hackers have caused. Existing firewalls (of which the author is a professional developer) and virus protection are valuable, but only if universally and rigorously used. Hackers should not be rewarded for turning "expert" but charged with grand theft, and people with top-secret access need to be paid more than clerks. He praises the better-trained personnel of the Transportation Security Authority and goes on to denounce the opposition to profiling as the dreaded "PC's." If Ranum demonizes anybody in this breezy first-person polemic, it is the media, with the standard charges of giving information to the enemy ("Thanks a lot, guys!"), but he also makes a persuasive case for their abysmal technical ignorance. (The ACLU is not accused of anything worse than having a radically different perspective than his about the long-term consequences of the Patriot Act.) Ranum notes I that more cooperation with foreign intelligence agencies is needed, and is possibly occurring. The turf war between the FBI and the CIA has to end. And the government's information technology system needs to be rationalized, starting about 10 years ago. At the end of Ranum's stocktaking, one is left with an instant soup-like aftertaste, but there are enough cubes of information among the "You Should Know" sidebars and "Bringing the Point Home" boxes, particularly for technophiles, to make it worthwhile. (Nov.) (Publishers Weekly, November 3, 2003)
()

Details

Link teilen